eyeswe
03-04 01:45 PM
http://www.immigrationboards.com/
for all UK related visa issues
for all UK related visa issues
wallpaper Rapper Lil#39; Wayne#39;s schedule
jim
09-06 11:54 PM
My I-140 approved in Aug 2007,My employer has withdrawn the I-140 in july but still it is approved in Aug 2007,Now my employer is agreed and want to sent the letter to USCIS not to withdrawn this I-140,As I am in Canada so they are planning to file the I-824 for me for Consular processing,so please advice do they need to file the new I-140 for me for Consular processing as they sent the withdrawn letter to uscis or is it ok for them to sent the letter again to uscis and telling them not to withdrawn this case and file I-824 for CP.Please advice!!!!!!
Blog Feeds
01-04 08:00 AM
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution mandates an inclusive mathematical formula for apportioning "Representatives . . . among the Several states". It requires a decennial census count of "the whole number of persons in each State" excluding untaxed Native Americans. As the New York Times reports, a push is on, using Christmas-themed posters in Spanish, to urge Hispanics (citizens, legal residents and the undocumented, especially Evangelical Christians) to cooperate with census-takers and be counted when the tally begins in March, 2010. The effort is targeted beyond the Hispanic community, with posters offered in English ("This is How Jesus Was...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2009/12/an-immigration-christmas-story-extended-through-march-2010.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2009/12/an-immigration-christmas-story-extended-through-march-2010.html)
2011 LIL WAYNE HITS 106 amp; PARK IN
popnfresh24
07-19 09:16 AM
It's still before midnight so i hope it's included :)
I took the photos myself and edited them... hope you like it
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d151/popnfresh24/OrangePopArt.jpg
I took the photos myself and edited them... hope you like it
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d151/popnfresh24/OrangePopArt.jpg
more...
ramaonline
01-12 03:47 PM
https://egov.immigration.gov/crisgwi/go?action=coa
cdeneo
05-14 04:25 PM
Valid AP is enough to travel - no one should care about your EAD if you are entering based on your AP. Ofcourse, always carry a copy of the I-485 and your wife can say that you are the primary applicant if they ask for her work status, etc...
Traveling with an AP (w/o EAD) should not be an issue. Good luck!
Traveling with an AP (w/o EAD) should not be an issue. Good luck!
more...
ramus
01-27 09:42 AM
Please join our NC IV group and you will get all info from our NC members.
please reply!!!!
please reply!!!!
2010 Maybe Lil Wayne is cut from
snathan
12-10 01:05 PM
hello! i overstayed my visa by several years, left , and was able to get a new tourist visa and enter the u.s.
after leaving the u.s, on return,i was denied enterance, removed and banned for 5 years. my boyfriend lives in u.s, he's a citizen. is a fiance visa helpful to allow me in until we get married? is there even a chance? or do we need to marry outside of the u.s in this case? thank you!
You are banned for 5 years.
after leaving the u.s, on return,i was denied enterance, removed and banned for 5 years. my boyfriend lives in u.s, he's a citizen. is a fiance visa helpful to allow me in until we get married? is there even a chance? or do we need to marry outside of the u.s in this case? thank you!
You are banned for 5 years.
more...
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:40 AM
We like to share that the H1B cap is extremely close to being reached. The count as of December 15, 2009 is 64,200. This is 1300 cases more than the count from December 11th. This count is very close to the total cap of 65,000 which is actually somewhat reduced by numbers allocated under trade agreements. We continue to watch this very closely, and will provide updates until the FY 2010 cap is reached.
We suggest to act quickly to avoid last minute embarrassment as H-1B Cap may soon be cease to exist.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/12/h1b_cap_updates_64200_as_of_de.html)
We suggest to act quickly to avoid last minute embarrassment as H-1B Cap may soon be cease to exist.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/12/h1b_cap_updates_64200_as_of_de.html)
hair If you were watching Lil Wayne
BEC_fog
12-27 11:05 AM
The primary can keep working on H1. If you don't plan on changing your job, be on H1. If there is any issue with your application, then you are still on H1. If you are on EAD and your application is denied, then your EAD also becomes invalid.
more...
Blog Feeds
07-23 04:20 AM
Immigration Law Headlines Has Just Posted the Following:
More... (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,0722-dzubow.shtm)
More... (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,0722-dzubow.shtm)
hot New adidas shoes by Jeremy
wandmaker
09-02 12:29 PM
I have applied for AP (I131) on 8/14/09 and my I-485 got approved on 9/01/09. Is USCIS is going to return my I131 fee or is there anything I have to initiate from my end to get the refund?.
Pls do let me know.
Thanks in advance.
one-way street; btw, they will send you denial notice, sign your name w/ $ amount and frame it. :D
Pls do let me know.
Thanks in advance.
one-way street; btw, they will send you denial notice, sign your name w/ $ amount and frame it. :D
more...
house Lil#39; Wayne Gives Credibility
Macaca
07-31 05:23 PM
It's Time to End Or Reduce The Cloture Clog (http://rollcall.com/issues/53_15/guest/19599-1.html) By Robert Weiner and John Larmett, July 31 2007
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
tattoo Fashion Lil Wayne#39;s Teddy Bear
golgappa
01-19 05:48 PM
AFAIK if company A did not revoked H1B I guess you can join Company A, please also check with any attorney.
Perm you dont have to file again.
Perm you dont have to file again.
more...
pictures 106 amp; Park New Year#39;s Eve
mhtanim
10-07 05:26 PM
Prakash is the Ex USCIS OMBUDSMAN. He retired from his position at the beginning of this year. Please read this link: http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2008/02/prakash-.html
dresses his New Year#39;s Eve show.
ranand00
09-28 09:50 AM
Hi
I have applied for cos from h1 to h4.
it is still pending. Am I eligible to renew my drivers license in PA based on pending cos to h4 receipt notice.
Any links or ideas are highly appreciated.
Thanks
anand
I have applied for cos from h1 to h4.
it is still pending. Am I eligible to renew my drivers license in PA based on pending cos to h4 receipt notice.
Any links or ideas are highly appreciated.
Thanks
anand
more...
makeup Lil Wayne-Watch My Shoes
Grudge
07-13 10:53 AM
I'd like to add children into a container and make them stack from the bottom left up like this:
0
00
000
0
000
00
000
000
000
0
000
000
etc.
Apparently there is no support for this in neither StackPanel or WrapPanel. Does anyone know of a way to do this?
Thanks!
0
00
000
0
000
00
000
000
000
0
000
000
etc.
Apparently there is no support for this in neither StackPanel or WrapPanel. Does anyone know of a way to do this?
Thanks!
girlfriend New adidas shoes by Jeremy
gchopes
04-21 07:56 AM
How long does it take for USCIS to issue receipt notice around this time of the month?
hairstyles If you were watching Lil Wayne
ras
06-13 03:29 PM
Here is a scenario:
Previous I 140 (EB2 PD Sept 2005) approved and is now current
Current I 485 filed based on another I 140 with PD in Dec 2006.
Can port over to the previous I 140 and can make I 485 current. The issue here is still unmarried so would like to hold on for few months to port over the PD.
Do you see an issue if porting is not done from EB2 Dec 2006 to the PD in EB2 Sept 2005?
How does it work if married after 3-6months and then want to port the PD for the spouse as well? Does Previous I 140 PD current still hold good?
If retrogression occurs once again do u still need to wait to port and get Green Card
Previous I 140 (EB2 PD Sept 2005) approved and is now current
Current I 485 filed based on another I 140 with PD in Dec 2006.
Can port over to the previous I 140 and can make I 485 current. The issue here is still unmarried so would like to hold on for few months to port over the PD.
Do you see an issue if porting is not done from EB2 Dec 2006 to the PD in EB2 Sept 2005?
How does it work if married after 3-6months and then want to port the PD for the spouse as well? Does Previous I 140 PD current still hold good?
If retrogression occurs once again do u still need to wait to port and get Green Card
a_paradkar
07-27 09:27 AM
I am currently working for Company A and would like to join company B on EAD. I have a valid EAD and would use it to switch over.
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
sujathar25
10-06 01:15 AM
Actually the change of status was meant to ask if the L1A gets rejected - can he move to L2 or H1 with change of status without leaving the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment